In just two months, over 11,500,000 people quit their jobs. The knee-jerk explanation you most often hear for this historic spike in turnover usually has something to do with COVID-19, a logical and safe place to go given all the givens that come with a globally disruptive pandemic. On the other hand, if you’re the kind of person that tries to find a little bit of good in everything, COVID-19 significantly reduced the traditional trauma associated with quitting.
“Leaders are made … and not born.”
Contact Us
While it seems easy to blame the cause of the Great Resignation on COVID-19, it likely makes more sense to look at leadership.
You could make a strong argument that the skill set distinguishing elite senior executives is their ability to identify the root cause, help others recognize it as such, and then mobilize a coordinated response. This is a process that bears a striking similarity to the deployment of the Situational Leadership® process by frontline managers at the base of an organization:
The contrast between the two is grounded in the complexity of the landscape senior executives navigate.
In that context, consider senior executives tasked with the responsibility of identifying the root cause of something like the “Great Resignation,” and then mobilizing a coordinated response. The surface analysis presents a streamlined explanation for causality:
Disruptive change, introduced by a global pandemic, provided a once-in-a-lifetime set of circumstances where employees around the world resigned from the workforce in mass. That cycle is in the process of normalizing.
But beneath that surface further consider that perhaps the root cause of the “Great Resignation” had more to do with enduring and highly familiar challenges than anything else. As is the case with most truly disruptive change, COVID-19 undeniably provided both the backdrop and the opportunity for record numbers of employees to transition, but why were they leaving and what did they hope to find?
According to research by The Josh Bersin Company, the answer to those questions had something to do with workplace dignity (WPD). Low levels of WPD are the fulcrum around which organizational challenges like employee engagement and retention revolve. In essence, WPD is comprised of:
So, as a disruptive change in any form hits and the normal flow of work has been upset, disordered or, perhaps, even rendered obsolete, valuable employees take stock of their existing WPD and surmise that the grass simply must be greener elsewhere.
Leaders that help others recognize that the root cause of challenges, like attrition during disruptive change might well have something to do with aggregate WPD, frequently double down on their efforts to build a culture defined by effective leadership. This is by no means a quick-fix-response. It is a long-term strategy. A strategy that views leadership, at all levels in an organization, as a viable and proactive approach to enhancing WPD.