If you have ever been through traditional sales training, you no doubt remember the attention given to closing skills. These techniques frequently featured directive questions sales types unveiled when they felt it was time to shut down an interaction, create a sense of urgency and move on.
Research on the deployment of these techniques has consistently revealed the following:
When we find ourselves in positions to influence others, it is important to consider the path we choose to follow prior to engaging. Will the influence opportunity be a transactional imperative where we are obligated to communicate a message and close a deal, so we do? Or will we approach it, regardless of the competing responses that hover for our attention, as a data point in a chain of evidence that will eventually define our leadership legacy?
Consider a challenging hypothetical as a test case. A scenario most in people management would just as soon avoid: terminating someone’s employment. Admittedly, the circumstances surrounding this task can contribute greatly to the specific tactics employed, but details aside, I would suggest there are paths to pursuing this exchange that bear a striking resemblance to a transactional sales type, or an alternative route that will be a clear indicator when all is said and done of your leadership legacy.
If nothing else, taking the time to thoughtfully prepare and sequence a list of items that need to be communicated will demonstrate you have taken this responsibility seriously while also providing you with the structure necessary to effectively navigate the discussion
Good sales people consistently have the best interests of their customers in mind. It’s what distinguishes them from their competitors. Along similar lines, good managers are distinguished by their comparative leadership legacies, and those legacies are a function of how they deliver unwelcome news.